Darwin Ruins Everything

Darwinism is dangerous in two ways. Most conservative Christians recognize the first way in which it’s dangerous. It substitutes a false account of mankind’s beginning for the true one. The practical-theological repercussions of this are devastating. Because it is so devastating, it’s right for Christians to combat Darwinism. That means we’re going to spend time defending the events of Genesis as true historical events.

The second danger Darwinism poses is related to the first, but is more subtle. In reacting to Darwinism, I’ve noticed a tendency to think about and read Genesis only as a corrective to Darwinism. We approach Genesis only to show why it is better than Darwinism as an account of our material origins, or why it can withstand scientific scrutiny. Again, there’s a time for that, but those are far from the only things Genesis has to teach us. You wouldn’t know that, though, just be scanning a lot of conservative teaching on Genesis.

The first three chapters of Genesis tell us what it means to be men, to be women, to be worshipping prophet-kings under God, to be pure, holy, and righteous. They tell us how our redemption is going to be shaped, and where the cosmos is going to end up. They tell us why baptism is so important, why men are forbidden to have long hair, and why women are not to rule or teach men. They tell us why Mankind stands upright instead of walking with his head to the ground like the beasts. They tell us why lying, murder, and adultery are evil. They tell us why CRSPR and IVF are bad. They tell us why God is good.

Yet we tend to ignore those sorts of things in our treatments of Genesis, even though those are precisely the things the rest of Scripture develops at length. Don’t ignore the wisdom of Genesis because Darwin questions the ‘science’ of Genesis. It’s a trick.

Advertisements

Automation

We are at the leading edge of a great displacement where low-skill workers will be replaced en masse by robots, without then being resettled in new jobs. Following already established trends, manufacturing will continue to become solely the domain of automated machines. As that occurs, other jobs, like truck drivers, clerical staff, food preparers/servers, etc., will increasingly see functions fulfilled by robots.

This will drastically decrease the total number of available low-skill jobs. Before, if any one company or industry hemorrhaged these kinds of jobs, these workers could be picked in other industries. Now, however, those fall-back positions being filled by robots.

This puts us in a situation where we are facing rapid, widespread job displacement with few, if any, prospects for those being displaced. This does not bode well for the social stability and maintenance of English ordered liberty that has been enjoyed by the Anglosphere in recent centuries. If the French and Russian revolutions teach us anything, it’s that destitute, angry, prospect-less denizens of the lower class will have their pound of flesh one way or another. It would be prudent if we took measures to retard the rate and narrow the scope of automation so that society can have time to adapt to the changes that are coming.